<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikrivers.com/2008/12/07/censorship/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikrivers.com/2008/12/07/censorship</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It says so on Wikipedia at nikrivers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nikrivers.com/2008/12/07/censorship#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>It says so on Wikipedia at nikrivers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikrivers.com/?p=368#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] anyone and everyone can edit or create Wikipedia articles on any subject (unless, of course, the IWF blocks Internet access to one particular image, and in doing so prevents the whole of your country from editing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anyone and everyone can edit or create Wikipedia articles on any subject (unless, of course, the IWF blocks Internet access to one particular image, and in doing so prevents the whole of your country from editing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikrivers.com &#187; Uncensored</title>
		<link>http://www.nikrivers.com/2008/12/07/censorship#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>nikrivers.com &#187; Uncensored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikrivers.com/?p=368#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] to my previous rant on censorship, it seems the IWF has decided it may have dropped a clanger in its decision to block (most) UK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to my previous rant on censorship, it seems the IWF has decided it may have dropped a clanger in its decision to block (most) UK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

